Posts Tagged ‘theater’

I’m Giving Birth… Buy A Ticket!

Tuesday, April 26th, 2011

No, I’m not actually giving birth (and if I were I definitely wouldn’t sell tickets to the blessed event), but this week I sort of feel like I’m in labor; directing for the theater is a kind of giving birth. Actually, I kind of feel like I’m the birthing coach, standing to the side, holding the actors’ hands and telling them to “Breathe, breathe, don’t push yet, don’t push yet… Okay, PUSH!!!” So it’s sort of appropriate that I just picked up an acting gig this weekend, playing… wait for it… a birthing instructor!

This Sunday May 1 at 8pm, I will be appearing in American Globe Theatre‘s 17th Annual 15-Minute Play Festival, playing a jaded, cynical birthing instructor in Michelle Weilert’s play, “Childbirth: It’s Lamazing!” Info and tickets here.

And next Thursday May 5, my “baby” is born: Night of the Living, written by Dave Lankford (and directed by me!), debuts as part of The Shelter’s Night Windows, at The Workshop Theater.

Night Windows runs May 5-15, Thursday thru Saturday at 8pm, Sunday at 3pm
Tickets: $18 at the door
$16 student & senior
$16 in advance online
OR for opening night (May 5) use special code CINCO for $14 tickets online!
Buy tickets here

So yeah, I’m giving birth… buy a ticket.

It Costs Money To Look This Good

Thursday, April 21st, 2011

Rehearsals for Night of the Living, the play I’m directing as part of Night Windows for The Shelter are going great – I’m learning a lot and we’re close to having a really great show. But it’s now crunch time, in terms of fundraising: we have already raised a lot (nearly $5K), but it’s going to cost around $10K to put this show up properly, so we are trying to bring in another $5K to get ‘er done. This is going to be like one of those lame station breaks on public radio where they interrupt the programming to ask for your support: “We can’t do it without you!” Well, we really can’t – if you read this blog, care about the arts, and would like to support the people who support me (at least artistically), then there are three things that you can do:

  1. Donate. All donations are 100% tax-deductible, and no amount is too small. Donation page is here.
  2. Party with us. We’re having a fundraiser this Saturday, April 23, from 9pm to 1am, at Black Bear Lodge on 3rd Ave @ 22nd. If you live in New York and enjoy theater, alcohol, fun, or any combination thereof, you should be there! $15 donation gets you Happy Hour prices till 1am: $4 well mixed drinks, $3/4 drafts, $3 select shots. More info here.
  3. Buy a ticket to our show. Night Windows is an evening of three original one-act plays inspired by the beautiful and haunting Edward Hopper painting of the same name, and is written, directed, and performed by the Shelter. We run May 5-15 at the Workshop Theater on W. 36th between 8th & 9th, and tickets are only $16 in advance online! More info and tickets here.

This concludes the fundraising portion of our broadcast… we now return you to our regular programming…

Perfection, Failure, 12 Steps

Tuesday, April 12th, 2011

So now that I’m deep into rehearsals for my next project, I find I’m having to remind myself that rehearsal is a place to fail – it’s where you find out what works, mostly by trying out everything that doesn’t. I know this as an actor, but I’m having to learn it all over again as a director. It’s a way of working that sort of runs counter to the way most other people operate. Most people go to work every day and try to SUCCEED – although, as Seth Godin recently pointed out on his blog, failure (and knowing how to do it better) is worth pursuing sometimes, even for people in non-artistic fields.

Even in our personal lives, we try to succeed at being our better selves, our more perfect selves – with yoga, self-help, gurus, Oprah, weight-loss, etc. Carina Chocano had a great “riff” on this current cultural obsession a few weeks back in the NY Times Magazine:

…this is the vision of perfection we’ve signed up for: That you must outsmart, outwork, outrival and outdream everybody else or consign yourself to a life of frustrated obscurity or worse. Perfection has always held a kind of promise, but this conception of it sounds less like a promise than a threat.

I’m with Chocano, and also with Randall Munroe of xkcd: this idea of perfection scares me sometimes, as do the people who promote it – some of them appear to be more excited about success itself than about doing the thing that they want to be successful at! It’s like that stereotypical 12-stepper who’s so into the 12 steps that they’ve basically just replaced one addiction (drugs or alcohol) with another (self-help & 12-step-programs), without addressing the underlying problem that’s creating their addictive behavior. Not to denigrate 12-steppers – I’ve met some pretty inspired (and inspiring) people who happen to be in “the program”. But I tend to think it’s because they’ve used the 12 steps as a tool to realize their true, amazing selves, not because the 12 steps are themselves necessarily true or amazing. However you get to the top of the mountain, I guess…

As it happens, there is a great case study of 12-steppers on Broadway right now, in Stephen Adly Guirgis’ Motherfucker with the Hat, which I’m pretty sure is only ON Broadway because of its big-name star, Chris Rock, given that the rest of Guirgis’ work has mostly been seen in Off- and Off-Off-Broadway houses. As well it should: this play seemed out of place in a big snazzy Broadway production, as if someone tried to put a comfy La-Z-Boy in the middle of a sleek corporate lobby. Rock seemed out of place as well – he’s a stand-up comedian and a film actor, not a stage actor. Normally this wouldn’t be too much of a hindrance – I’ve seen lots of film and TV actors do just fine on Broadway – but Rock is forced to share the stage with a real live stage actor, the immensely talented Bobby Cannavale, who actually inhabits his character with life, spirit, and moment-to-moment presence, making Chris Rock look like a wise-cracking, indicating amateur by comparison…

On a somewhat unrelated note, a group called The Orange Hats “archived” the audience response to a project I was working on earlier this year, a production of The Changing Room at T Schreiber Studio, and I think it’s cool: see for yourself.

Girls v. Boys, Coda – Decision Points & Next Steps

Friday, March 25th, 2011

NOTE: I just spent two months working as an assistant director for a play with an all-male cast at an off-off-Broadway theater for part of the week, and working as a server at a French restaurant with an all-female wait staff the rest of the week. I documented my experiences in this series of posts.

So now that the show has been open for four weeks, and I’ve had ample time to recover from the flurry of activity and stress that is tech and opening weekend, it seems like a good time to look back and reflect on this whole experience. Did the predictions I outlined in my first post come true? What did I learn? What’s next for me? For this blog?

The answers, in no particular order:

  1. Re: Prediction #1: No one will read this blog. Some people actually did/do read this blog. They are mostly family and friends, and I can count them all on one hand, but I think the most important thing is that I’m doing this for me, and that I’m getting something out of it for myself – specifically, it’s been a good tool for self-expression and reflection. And as it happens to be public, there’s the added bonus that my family and friends get to keep up with what’s really going on in my life, aside from the occasional phone or email exchange, which usually involves a lot of preliminary, superficial shit like, “How the weather? How’s the cat? Did you catch this week’s House?” All that stuff is great, but it’s nice to just cut to the chase and get to the deeper things sometimes, and this blog allows me to do that.
  2. Re: Prediction #2: No one will care about this blog. Well, I care, and that’s enough.
  3. Re: Predictions #3 & #8: There will be more drama at the restaurant than at the theater (as the restaurant staff are all young women), and I will develop inappropriate crushes on the cast/crew (as the cast are all male and good-looking). There turned out to be drama aplenty in both environments; but I’ve discovered that, whether because of age, experience, or the clarity I’ve gained by taking time for occasional reflection in writing for this blog, I now appear to have developed the ability to identify the moment at which I can either allow myself to be sucked into some developing drama or walk away from it. This may seem silly, but up until now, I was never able to see these moments, or “decision points”, if you will. I always felt as if I were just propelled (or compelled, as the case may be) into sticky situations, like a piece of driftwood being pulled along for the bumpy ride, only to be spit out and smashed up on the shore when all was said and done. But now I notice when a comment is made, a look is exchanged, or another drink is ordered – it’s as if I can see the ensuing drama starting to unfold in my mind, and I know I can either choose to become a part of it, or walk outside and hail a cab home. It doesn’t mean I don’t still make stupid decisions sometimes – I keep talking when I know I should shut up, I return the meaningful glance, I stay for the next round – but now I know, to some degree, what I’m doing, and what the consequences will be. I still get occasionally beat up and washed ashore emotionally, but at least I’m saying to myself the whole time, “Well, I sort of knew this would happen.” So in my book, that’s progress…
  4. Re: Predictions #4 & #5: The guys will get on the same cycle and the men will work better together than the women. I didn’t really have enough time or the right kind of expertise to test out or evaluate these theories. I think it’s an issue for a different kind of blog and a different kind of blogger…
  5. Re: Predictions #6 & #7: I will hate or be bad at directing and I will learn a lot. Certainly, I learned a LOT; and as it turns out, I liked directing for the most part, and had a lot of fun. Whether I’m any good at it remains to be seen; but you can judge for yourself soon enough – which brings me to my…

Next Steps…
Yes, I will now be re-focusing on my main purpose in life, which is to be an actor. To that end, I have enrolled in an upcoming workshop with actors’ advocate Dallas Travers, in order to bone up on my business and marketing skills (since I’m now pretty confident in my craft, having spent several years studying at both the T Schreiber Studio in New York and Larry Moss Studio in Los Angeles).

But, in addition, I have also become involved with a group called The Shelter, and have signed on to direct a one-act as part of Night Windows, an evening of three original one-acts, inspired by the Edward Hopper painting of the same name, to be performed at the WorkShop Theater, May 5-15, 2011. I’m very excited about this endeavor, and I hope you’ll join me for it, if you can (performance and ticketing details will be forthcoming). And I do hope that you’ll keep following me here, as I continue to blog about my adventures as an actor, director, and person.

Girls v. Boys, Vol. VI – Opening

Saturday, February 26th, 2011

NOTE: I am currently working as an assistant director for a play with an all-male cast at an off-off-Broadway theater for part of the week, and working as a server at a French restaurant with an all-female wait staff the rest of the week. I’m documenting my experiences in this series of posts. The production is The Changing Room, directed by Terry Schreiber at the T Schreiber Studio. The names of the restaurant and my coworkers are withheld for privacy.

Tonight is opening night! It’s too busy and I’m too overwhelmed this week to write anything. I’ll leave you with a link to a feature article about our show on NearSay, a production photo, and a special video of our delicious TD Mike Dazé, who, after a long night of building sets, likes to lip-sync to Disney songs.

The Changing Room

Girls v. Boys, Vol. V – Exhaustion

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

NOTE: I am currently working as an assistant director for a play with an all-male cast at an off-off-Broadway theater for part of the week, and working as a server at a French restaurant with an all-female wait staff the rest of the week. I’m documenting my experiences in this series of posts. The production is The Changing Room, directed by Terry Schreiber at the T Schreiber Studio. The names of the restaurant and my coworkers are withheld for privacy.

I’m reminded this week how exhausting it can be: both restaurant work and theater work are, at times, physically, mentally and emotionally draining. As a server, especially on a busy night (as we just had this week, with Valentine’s Day), you can get so overloaded with tables and orders that your brain goes on the fritz and you get down “in the weeds”, as they say; then there’s all the bustling around and running back and forth you have to do, which takes a toll on your body; as well as the fake-smiling and smothering your contempt for difficult customers, which can be emotionally taxing. Add it all up and by the end of some nights, you feel like your body is one big ball of soreness, your mind is gone to mush, and you just might strangle the next person who looks at you. On nights like those, after closing, some of the girls (myself included) will often steal away behind the bar and pour ourselves a quick glass of wine before heading out, just to help ease ourselves back into the real world.

In the theater, the week prior to opening night is always an exhausting one: the actors, crew and designers spend eight to twelve hours a day in the theater, several days in a row, meticulously and carefully putting the finishing touches on the show, trying to nail down every last detail – sound, lights, cues, props, sets, costumes, entrances, exits, actions, reactions, etc. We aren’t there yet with The Changing Room, but it’s fast approaching: opening night is Saturday, February 26, and tech week starts TOMORROW! Even though I’ve only recently discovered the exhausting nature of restaurant work and am only now starting to adapt to it (it’s a miracle that I managed to be an actor for so long WITHOUT working in food service!), I have been working in theatrical production for at least 15 years now, so I’m all prepared for tech: I’ve taken most of the next week off from work at the restaurant, I’ve done all my laundry, cleaned my apartment, and stocked up on plenty of snacks and made-ahead meals to keep in the studio fridge during rehearsals. I once worked with a producer who stated that she didn’t “believe” in tech without food, and would always keep snacks and beverages around for her cast and crew during technical rehearsals. Because it’s tech! And tech is exhausting.

Rugby is a pretty exhausting game as well – especially rugby league, the type of game played by the lads in The Changing Room. In his background notes on the text, playwright David Storey writes that it is “a very tough, professional, tackling, running and kicking game” in which the players “wear little or no padding,” and that it is “full of fouling and physical exhaustion.” Even acting like a rugby league player can be physically demanding: for instance, in the second act, when the players run back into the locker room for the ten-minute break between the first and second halves of the game, they have to look as if they’ve just been playing hard and fast for the last forty minutes or so, on a field that’s nearly frozen and in weather that chills to the bone. The actors have to psych themselves out right before this scene: jumping jacks, running up and down the hall, push-ups, rubbing hands together, tensing up their backs and shoulders… anything to trick their bodies and their subconscious minds into believing in the circumstances of the cold and the game, leading them to more authentic behavior as they walk onstage. It’s gotten to the point now where every time we come upon that point in the play, I involuntarily shiver with the “fake” chill the actors are bringing in with them as they enter!

Of course, all of this exhaustion isn’t for nought; after all, nothing really worth doing is easy. We made a lot of money on Valentine’s Day at the restaurant; and although tech can be tedious, by the end of it you (hopefully) have a fully lit, fully cued, fully costumed show, ready to open; and for all the bumps, bruises and cuts a rugby player may endure, the aches and pains eventually fade with a hot bath, a stiff pint, and the thrill of victory.

Girls v. Boys, Vol. IV – Uniforms

Wednesday, February 9th, 2011

NOTE: I am currently working as an assistant director for a play with an all-male cast at an off-off-Broadway theater for part of the week, and working as a server at a French restaurant with an all-female wait staff the rest of the week. I’m documenting my experiences in this series of posts. Details on the production – The Changing Room, directed by Terry Schreiber at the T Schreiber Studio in New York City – are here. The names of the restaurant and my coworkers are withheld for privacy.

Uniforms: my life is filled with them right now; both of my teams wear them. In the show, the lads all have their numbered rugby jerseys, black shorts, knee-high socks, and rugby boots; at the restaurant, our servers are required to wear something resembling a (conservative) French maid outfit: black v-neck top, black pencil skirt, black tights, black patent leather shoes, white collar, white apron. Some of these items are provided by the management, some of them come from the members themselves: for instance, all the actors had to go get their own jock straps, tie-ups for their socks, and period underwear (which made for some pretty hilarious emails back and forth with the stage manager and costume designer, i.e. “Boxers or briefs?… No Calvin Klein or other writing on the waistband, please!… Make sure you label your jock!”). At the restaurant, we are provided with shirts, skirts, collars and aprons, but we must buy our own tights and shoes; on top of that, we’re responsible for laundering and maintaining everything (except the aprons, which must remain pristinely white and starched, so they’re sent out to professional laundry). It’s a constant battle to keep up with the wear and tear: one finds oneself doing laundry twice as much as one used to, lest one should find oneself wearing (as some girls do who are desperate, or just laundry-impaired) last night’s dirty shirt at this morning’s lunch shift. I often find myself cursing for forgetting to file my nails after I’ve ripped through yet ANOTHER pair of black tights, and I end up scouring the shelves at DSW for a new pair of black patent leather shoes every few months (they wear out real fast, and hurt your feet in unbearable ways when they do! It’s almost the same frustration that one of the characters in the play expresses in the first act, when he complains about a missing stud on his shoes: “Come up to training and nearly bust me bloody ankle!”).

But it’s more than just the clothes: the lads have all been asked to grow their hair, facial hair and sideburns out in period-specific ways (lots of mutton chops and mustaches in northern England in the 1970s!) and many of them are having to cover up any tattoos they have that wouldn’t be appropriate in our setting. At the restaurant, we girls are asked to keep our hair pulled back and up, to apply a small amount of tasteful makeup, if any, and to wear only conservative jewelry and neutral nail polish. All these little details really add up to generate a real sense of uniformity and homogeneity, which, though it serves the purposes of the rugby team and our restaurant, can also sometimes end up hiding a lot of individuality. It only takes going to a social gathering of either team outside of our normal environments to realize it; we take for granted that we all look the same, until we all go to some party somewhere and see each other in our street clothes, with our hair down, flashy jewelry out, piercings and tattoos displayed proudly, fingernails painted in reckless colors – “Oh my gosh, you have HAIR!!!”… “You look so different in a suit!”… “I almost didn’t recognize you without your apron!” Then we remember that under those somewhat invisibility-inducing uniforms, there is a panoply of unique individuals, just waiting to break out, come quitting time. It’s one of the things I like about David Storey’s play: each member of this 15-man rugby team comes in to the changing room his own man, with his own hat, coat, wife, children, aches, pains, worries, hopes and fears; we see how each of them peels off the various layers of his individuality to transform himself into a perfectly fitted piece of a sleek, strong, solid rugby-playing machine; then after the job is done and the game is over, each of them gradually slips back into his clothes and his life, heads off to the pub (or the hospital, as the case may be!), only to come back and do it again next week…

Girls v. Boys, Vol. III – Family

Thursday, February 3rd, 2011

NOTE: I am currently working as an assistant director for a play with an all-male cast at an off-off-Broadway theater for part of the week, and working as a server at a French restaurant with an all-female wait staff the rest of the week. Hilarity and drama may very well ensue, so just in case, I’m documenting my experiences in this series of posts. Details on the production – The Changing Room, directed by Terry Schreiber at the T Schreiber Studio in New York City – are here. The names of the restaurant and my coworkers are withheld for privacy.

Another striking similarity between my two separate (yet equally lovely) workplaces this month: the strong sense of family in both environments. The restaurant is a fine example of this: not all food service establishments make an effort to foster a feeling of togetherness among their staff, but ours does. Before the restaurant opens for each shift, both lunch and dinner, we all sit together for “family meal”, a (mostly) delicious and (somewhat) nutritious hot meal, served at no cost to the staff and while we are all on the clock. Additionally, we all change in and out of our uniforms before and after each shift in the same locker room (just like the boys in The Changing Room!), and as I noted in my previous post, we all work as a team while we’re on the floor. All of these factors work to create an intensely close-knit sense of community among the staff: we are not just co-workers, we are friends, drinking buddies, workout partners, sympathetic ears, open hearts, and helping hands. Some of us live together as roommates; or we crash at each other’s apartments when the trains are down; or we spend the holidays with each other when we can’t go home to be with our (real) families. Many of us spend so much time together that, as previously noted, we are even on the same monthly hormonal cycle! As with any family, we may have our little tiffs and stand-offs with each other every once in a while (especially during that special week every month when we all need lots of chocolate!), but things usually blow over; and the same two girls who were at odds one month are best friends the next.

There is a similar sense of family beginning to develop among the cast and crew of The Changing Room, not only because theater is naturally a collaborative art, but especially because of the subject of this particular play: team sports and male bonding. At the director’s insistence, the cast all refer to each other by their character names, both in and out of rehearsal; he has also required them each to write a character biography, which they then shared with the rest of the cast (in a previous post, the boys have also been required to attend rugby practice sessions, during which they learned the ins and outs of the game and practiced playing together as a team. We have also had several “team outings” outside of rehearsal, where we all gathered together at some appointed place and time for dinner, drinks, and general carousing. All of this served to encourage these men to get to know each other more closely, both on a character level and personally as actors. I hear them greeting each other now in the morning when they all arrive for rehearsal, and they sound just like their characters in the play – checking in with each other about illnesses, aches, pains (unavoidable at this time of year); asking after wives, girlfriends, children; gently teasing about the hijinks that went on the night before at the bar, etc. Some of them even built backstories into their bios which featured other characters, so that when they shared them with their fellow actors playing those characters, those actors were instantly inspired to continue building and contributing to the team’s collective history with one another. And of course all of this leads to more specific, realistic and truthful moments happening onstage. Can’t wait to buy your ticket, can you?

Girls v. Boys, Vol. II – Positions

Monday, January 24th, 2011

NOTE: For the next two months, I will be working as an assistant director for a play with an all-male cast at an off-off-Broadway theater for part of the week, and working as a server at a French restaurant with an all-female wait staff the rest of the week. Hilarity and drama may very well ensue, so just in case, I’ll be documenting my experiences in this series of posts. Details on the production – The Changing Room, directed by Terry Schreiber at the T Schreiber Studio in New York City – are here. The names of the restaurant and my coworkers are withheld for privacy.

So believe it or not, I’m finding a few parallels between the two sides of this strange and intriguing double life I’m now leading. Here’s one: positions. Each of these teams that I’m now a part of has a pretty specific division of labor. Everyone’s got their positions to play, and the duties and responsibilities that go with them are all very separate and pretty clearly defined. That’s true for the play both in the sense that each person working on it has a specific role to fulfill, whether they are an actor playing one of the characters or a designer making the sets or costumes to support him; but also in the sense that the play is actually ABOUT a rugby team, and in rugby there are very specific positions, each with different playing styles. As the actors are learning in their rugby workouts (even though they never actually play for real onstage, they’re being coached on how to play for authenticity’s sake — and for fun), the scrum-half has specific things he’s responsible for on the field, which is different from what, say, the hooker has to do, which in turn is different from what the guy playing on the wing does, which is also different from what one of the other forwards might do. We learned early on in casting, too, that the men playing different positions will generally have different body types: for instance, the wings are usually smaller and faster guys, whereas forwards are generally big guys who can take a lot of punishment when they’re pushed down into the scrum. But they all work together to run the ball into the goal.

Similarly, on the floor of our restaurant, each girl is assigned a particular section of tables that she’s responsible for, and with that section comes a specific set of “side work” duties – section 7 runs clean plates out onto the floor, section 2 polishes silverware, section 9 restocks sugar caddies, etc. I know most teams of one sort of another end up dividing labor as they work to achieve a common objective, but I like the idea that in these three kinds of group work – restaurant work, theater, and rugby – the divisions are very stark. There’s something about this way of working that appeals to me; I think it’s the idea that you only have a set number of things that you really have to worry about, and for everything else you can count on your teammates to have your back. Maybe it’s because I’m someone who tends to get tunnel vision, or one-track-mind, as they say: I can get so engrossed in a task that the hours just fly by, before I look up and realize that I had other things to do. The thing I like about working on a team like this is that my tunnel vision doesn’t necessarily need to be a problem anymore. Now, when I look up from having focused on my own little tasks for hours on end, instead of discovering all the things that are yet left to be done, I discover that, through the similarly tireless labor of others with their noses to the grindstone all night long, we have suddenly arrived at our collective goal: we’ve closed the restaurant for the night and made a ton of money; we’ve got a kickass show with authentic characters and genuine performances; or we’ve run the ball right through the defense and scored a try (rugby for touchdown). That’s kinda cool.

Girls v. Boys, Vol I – Predictions (or, the Unicorn Post)

Tuesday, January 18th, 2011

NOTE: For the next two months, I will be working as an assistant director for a play with an all-male cast at an off-off-Broadway theater for part of the week, and working as a server at a French restaurant with an all-female wait staff the rest of the week. Hilarity and drama may very well ensue, so just in case, I’ll be documenting my experiences in this series of posts. Details on the production – The Changing Room, directed by Terry Schreiber at the T Schreiber Studio in New York City – are here. The names of the restaurant and my coworkers are withheld for privacy.

Okay, so we’ve already been in rehearsals for two weeks now, and I had meant to post something before we’d even started, but hey, the best-laid plans of mice and… women?…

I had intended for this fantastical first post which never happened – my unicorn first post – to be a “predictions” post of sorts: a kind of listing of things which I and others believed I would discover during this whole experience. I went around in the weeks prior to rehearsals telling all the people in my life about my exciting new project, and I solicited their predictions, if they had any. I even took notes! But then the new year came, rehearsals started, and this whole working-six-days-a-week-plus-going-to-the-gym thing was really kicking my ass… and I am also, in case you didn’t know, a world-class procrastinator. So that sad little unicorn first post just sat there on my laptop, neglected and unpublished.

But hey, better late than never, right? And since we’re only two weeks in, it’s still early enough in the process that listing predictions may not be entirely ridiculous; so here are, in no particular order, my (and others’) predictions about my new adventure in directing and blogging:

  1. No one will read this blog. HA! Well, you just disproved that one, didn’t you?
  2. No one will CARE about this blog. Hrm. Harder to disprove, but I suppose if you’ve read this far past #1, then perhaps you care just a tiny bit…
  3. There will be more drama at the restaurant than at the theater. I’m not entirely sure about this one. Yeah, serving can be kind of a shitty job, causing undue stress among the people who have to do it together, and whenever you put a bunch of young women in their 20s and 30s together in a stressful environment, you’re bound to have some drama. But let’s not forget that: a) the men of The Changing Room cast are all ACTORS, and let’s face it, whether they’re gay or straight, actors tend to be a little more self-involved and prone to drama than other men; and b) there is FULL nudity in this show, and some of the actors, although they all know what they’ve signed on for, are bound to be self-conscious and nervous about it, thus potentially creating some drama. We shall see…
  4. As is the case with women who work together, the men in the show will all get on the same hormone cycle. This one seems specious, but I’ve heard from a number of people that men have a monthly “cycle” just like women do (after a cursory Google search, I can’t find any hard evidence for it, but if anyone would like to take a crack at some more in-depth research, please let me know what you find in the comments). But it’s certainly true that women working or living closely together will tend to get on the same cycle: those of us girls at the restaurant whose cycles are not regulated by medication or other factors have definitely all “synced” up. There is a certain week each month when passions seem to flare in that place, and it’s usually just a good idea to keep your head down and keep your purse stocked with plenty of chocolate until the week is over. Whether the men will end up the same way, well, should be interesting…
  5. The men will be better at working together than the women. I suppose this is sort of a corollary to #3, really, but this gets into some stereotypes about men and women which I have always wondered about. Yes, girls can be pretty mean to each other sometimes, but we do have some examples of women working well together as a team. And there are certainly plenty of examples of guys working together as teams and committees and such like – I mean, they kind of ran the world for most of recorded history, and to a certain extent they still do. But they also had wars and such, so… It’ll be intriguing to see who gets along better with each other, the boys or the girls…
  6. I will hate and/or be bad at directing. Entirely possible. This is my first time doing anything like directing since I took a course in college. I have a mouthy, bossy streak, and it’s something I don’t like about myself; so that’s always kept me from pursuing directing. I never wanted to be “that bitch” Olivia who’s always telling people what to do; I’d rather just keep to myself and do a job that doesn’t require me to have any authority over or responsibility for others, so as not to cause any problems. But I have strong opinions, especially about theater and acting, and inevitably my big mouth gets me in trouble. Lately though, it’s seemed to me that perhaps there might be a way for me to pursue directing without letting my stupid mouth get in the way, so I’ve decided to give it a try again by taking this assistant directing assignment. So far though, I have HATED casting, which is a pretty important part of directing: mostly because, for this particular show, there were so many actors who auditioned that I loved, but who didn’t end up getting cast! It broke my heart. As for the actual directing part, it’s hard to say: it’s still early, and assistant-directing is very different from directing-directing. More on that later…
  7. I will learn a lot. Very likely. Terry Schreiber is a great director, and I have already learned so much from him as an acting teacher, so there’s probably a lot more to glean from watching him work in rehearsals. Again, more on this later…
  8. I will become distracted by the nudity and develop inappropriate crushes on the cast. I thought this might be a problem for me, because I am single and do tend to fall in love with people I work with (though that hasn’t been a problem with the girls at the restaurant, since I was straight last time I checked – but you never know: I mean, did you see Black Swan?). But it’s strange: so far, although we have an incredibly good-looking cast and some of them are indeed single (and TOTALLY work out!), I’m finding that seeing these guys fully naked during rehearsals is actually a bit of a turn-off. Now I am not one of those girls who thinks male genitalia is gross or icky – yes, penises are beautiful, thank you very much. But there’s something about seeing a guy when he’s unintentionally at his most open and vulnerable – perhaps craning his head to hear a joke that one of his teammates just made, in the middle of getting his jockstrap on, completely unaware that the way he’s just bent himself around has completely exposed the family jewels to the audience – that makes it almost a sacred experience; and in that context, it’s almost impossible to think of these guys in a sexual way.

That’s plenty for now, I think. I’ll probably be back next week with a second post, most likely about some of the parallels that I’m finding between the team of girls at the restaurant and our team of boys at the theater. But if I’m going to get that done by next week, I’ll have to start procrastinating now! So much loafing to do, so little time…